writing life

Ozymandias is still a jerk

Chances are, if you’re a writer–professional, aspiring, tech, vengeful–you don’t need another reason to despair.  The economy stinks, publishing is pretty selective, agents are harder to come by, the ice caps are melting and soon polar bears will be moving down into your neighborhood to do the writing jobs and the herring they work for is at a premium.  Yes, things can be pretty gloomy.

So you don’t really need to read this piece here from an anonymous midlist author expounding on why it can (and frequently does) suck to be an author.  You could compare salaries, you could identify with her envy complex with books by other authors, you could sympathize with her lack of jobs and still feel slightly enraged for her bringing this upon you when you didn’t need it.

And if you read it, you probably will.  I can’t say I was immune to the despair that crept over me.

Being an author is sometimes like being back in high school.

No, not in the sense that there are people waiting to stuff you in lockers.  I’ve never been anything but aggressively honest when I say that there has never been a non-supportive author or peer in this industry.  Everyone remembers what it’s like, everyone remembers how hard it is and everyone wants you to succeed.

Nor in the sense that there are superiors that you privately resent.  Your editors definitely are invested in your success and frequently in you as a person.  And if I ever called my editors Mr. Spanton or Mr. Anders, they’d probably look at me real weird and then maybe push me down a flight of stairs.

Rather, being an author is occasionally like high school in that you instantly become the same insecure, crackly-voiced soothsayer who divines omens in coincidence, conspiracy in misfortune and crisis in the natural passage of time.  Thoughts of “is she prettier than me,” “does he think he’s bigger than me,” “have their pubes come in yet” rather swiftly turns to “does she have foreign-rights deals,” “does he think his twitter followers makes him more important,” “oh my god, they definitely got pubes now.”

I exaggerate.

But not by a lot.

The truth is that writing, especially professional writing, is unnervingly like going through puberty again.  You’re embarking on something that’s entirely new to you.  It’s slightly less sweaty, of course, but frequently as awkward and often difficult to get by.  The chief problem is that, although there’s books, classes and talks on the subject, all of them (including this one) will fall short of what you really need because it’s different for everyone and the only thing you have to compare against is your peers…for whom it’s entirely different.

So, if you’re anything like me, you stress yourself out.  You cringe when you hear other peoples’ good news, no matter how much you might have wished that good news for them.  Your neck tenses up when you look at your manuscript and wonder exactly what it is you’re doing with it.  You panic and run naked in the streets screaming “I’M DOING IT WRONG!  I’M DOING IT WRONG!

Eventually, you pass out.  You wake up on the floor of your office.  You find your trousers.  You sigh and crawl back up and you start writing again.

Because this is pretty much the only universal truth in writing: if you’re going to, then you will.

This is the sole constant of writing and the most-often underrated aspect.  You will use talent a lot in writing your book, in the initial spark, in the prose, in the narrative and voice.  You will use luck once or twice, in things that are largely out of your hands.  You will use persistence, perseverance and everything else that implies sitting down and doing it even if you don’t feel like it for absolutely everything else.

Because what other people do, what other people experience, what deals they make, what money they get, what followers they have, they’re going through the same stuff you are.  And if they weren’t, it wouldn’t matter.  Your writing moves the way it does.  You can nudge it along, you can try marketing techniques, you can try holding your breath and whistling Dixie if you think it’ll make your moustache grow quicker.  But the only way to succeed at being a writer is to write, no matter what else happens.

Because no one really knows what’s going to happen.  You can look to agents and publishers like they know, and they might have a better idea than you do, but ideas is ideas.  No one knows what will hit next, when it will hit, why it will hit.  No one knows what’s going to spend years writing, only to take off suddenly one day.  No one knows when you’re going to get hair on your body.  Certainly not you.  I wouldn’t advise asking your publishers, either.  They’ll be weirded out.

Has this helped the despair you may feel?  Probably not.  Will it ward against the despair you’ll feel in the future?  I can almost assure you it won’t.  Did this blog post solve all your problems?  Not a chance in hell.

Because, like puberty, it’s not a choice for a writer.  What else are you going to do?  No matter what the others are up to, you’ve still got to write.  Not for the editors, for the money, for the fame.  It’s just something you’re going to do.  Because you’re a writer.

Duh.

Ozymandias is still a jerk Read More »

Does Nostalgia Do SF a Disservice?

Over on Futurismic, Paul Raven points to a post by Ian Sales saying, “Readers new to the genre are not served well by recommendations to read Isaac Asimov, EE ‘Doc’ Smith, Robert Heinlein, or the like. Such fiction is no longer relevant, is often written with sensibilities offensive to modern readers, usually has painfully bad prose, and is mostly hard to find because it’s out of print. A better recommendation would be a current author – such as Richard Morgan, Alastair Reynolds, Iain M Banks, Ken MacLeod, Stephen Baxter, and so on.”

To which I say, “Amen.”

I was in Barnes & Noble some months back and bumped into a friend of mine with his daughter. He told me she had been assigned Fahrenheit 451 at school, to which I replied, “You poor girl. You are going to hate it. It’s about an old man whining that his wife watches too many soap operas, and nothing happens it it until the cities arbitrarily blow up at the end on cue. Please don’t think that’s the sort of thing I do for a living. Come with me.” Then I walked her over to a display of Scott Westerfeld’s Uglies books and said, “Here, this is much more representative of contemporary SF. Try this.”

I bumped into them a month later and asked how it went. I found out that, as predicted, she hated the Bradbury, but they were there so she could pick up the third book in the Uglies series. She is now an avid Westerfeld fan.

This isn’t to say that I didn’t enjoy Bradbury, or that it is not of historical importance, or that *working professionals* in the SF field and wanna-be-writers don’t have a responsibility to know their history so they don’t struggle to reinvent the wheel, but half-a-century old fiction is NOT the starting point for newbies who have never encountered the genre before. People coming in cold, particularly people coming in from positive encounters with media SF&F, ought to start with contemporary writers. When I set about to recommend books to new SF&F readers, I typically ask them what kind of films they like and then pair them on that basis. The Matrix? Try Charles Stross, Karl Schroeder, Ian McDonald, Cory Doctorow, etc… Buffy the Vampire Slayer? How about Jim Butcher, Patricia Briggs, Justina Robson. Star Wars? How about Gardner Dozois and Jonathan Strahan’s The New Space Opera, or the works of Karen Traviss? Firefly/Serenity? – Mike Resnick’s Santiago books, and his current Starship series. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind/Being John Malkovich? Something by Jonathan Lethem, maybe As She Crawled Across the Table.

I have met so many people, who when they learn what I do, tell me “Oh, I tried science fiction once. I didn’t like it.” When I asked them what they read, they invariably say they went into the SF&F section, started at the A’s, and grabbed the first thing they recognized – Isaac Asimov. Tried it, and found it cold and dated.

Again, this is NOT to say that the enthusiast, the purest, the aficionado, the die-hard, the wanna be, the professional, the completist shouldn’t read the A,B,C’s of the Golden Age, or that those texts no longer have anything to say to us, only that if someone came to me having just seen The Bourne Ultimatum and wanted to know what contemporary spy novels he or she should read for more of the same, I wouldn’t start him or her off with Joseph Conrad’s The Secret Agent. (If they *end* up there, fine, but I wouldn’t *start* them there).

I think matching them with the analogous movie works best (produces better results than asking people what sort of “mainstream” they read), though 9 times out of 10, you’d do just as well to just hand them John Scalzi’s Old Man’s War.

Does Nostalgia Do SF a Disservice? Read More »

I’ve been reflecting on Denvention and feeling weird about the Hugos, as I seem to every year. This competition and the general race to success in our field reminds me how much stress is a part of jumping into this fray. Margaret Hoelzer, the Beijing Olympics silver-medalist for the 200 meter backstoke, seemed to have similar things on her mind on Friday. She’s had ups and downs in her career, the Seattle Times reported, but she’s found a balancing ground in her attitude.

“I never really race for a medal. I usually just race for my personal best. This sport can be grinding. The competition, the expectations can chew you up . . . . All the joy that got you into the pool in the beginning can be replaced by a sense of dread, a gnawing doubt about where all of this is taking you.”

She went on to talk about the difficult times in her career– “Everyone goes through them if they’re in the sport long enough.” –and the stress of high-tech diets and early morning trainings.

This reminds me of the writing life, where getting words on the page (an ugly definition, yes?) can shut out so much else that you might be doing for physical health, family, and just fun. Then she says the thing that really struck me: Just before the Olympics, she made a conscious decision to dump the stress and enjoy the ride. “You realize there is more to life than just swimming.” She jokes that she’s going backward, turning into an eight-year-old, choosing to enjoy the swim.

She got out of a mental rut and went back to the joy of swimming. As long as I’ve been in this business, I loved hearing a superb competitor put this into words.

Read More »

Scroll to Top