Featured

adding a post to this category features the post on the front page.

Phoenix Comicon Schedule

It is upon us, my friends.  This weekend, Friday to Sunday, I will be at Phoenix Comicon, providing a valuable service to the community by being just the best darn author I can be.

Let’s see what I’m doing, shall we?

Sci-Fi Authors & Social Media – Authors today spend a lot of time online conversing with fans about their work and everything under the sun. How do they keep social media from taking over their lives, while making their online presence a good experience for them and their fans? Panelists: Cherie Priest,Jack Mangan,John Scalzi,Paul Cornell,Sam Sykes
When: Fri, 10:30-11:30AM (Room 122 Sci Fi)

This one is always a favorite of mine.  For those of you who can’t make it, but really want to know what the secret of using social media to communicate is: don’t be a complete asshole.  It’s much easier to interact with people if you actually like humanity.  But maybe my esteemed co-panelists will have a different opinion.

The Dos and Don’ts of Epic Fantasy – Our panel of authors discuss the clichés and tropes inherent in epic fantasy, and how they avoid or change them in their own work. Panelists: James A Owen,Michael A. Stackpole,Sam Sykes
When: Fri, 4:30-5:30PM (Room 124B Sci Fi)

Do: write a good story.

Don’t: I’ll tell you when you get there.

The Big Idea – The Big Idea, a regular feature on “Whatever” (John Scalzi’s website), gives authors the chance to talk about the “big idea” that went into their novels. Join John and several of those authors for a look at their big ideas. Panelists: Cherie Priest,James A Owen,John Scalzi,Jordan Summers,Kevin Hearne,Sam Sykes
When: Sat, 10:30-11:30AM (Room 122 Sci Fi)

Oh my god, this is pretty much everyone here.  This will be nuts.  You need to see this one.

Poisoned Pen Signing with Scalzi at the Poisoned Pen – Saturday 5:00 pm

You will hate yourself if you miss this.

The Rules of Writing Magic – Everyone knows you can lose an arm apparating without proper focus. And that you’ll get yourself killed seeking beyond the Outer Gates. Explore how the rules of magic established years ago affect how authors will write magic for years to come. Panelists: Allyson James,James A Owen,Sam Sykes
When: Sun, 4:30-5:30PM (Room 124A Sci Fi)

This one, to be honest, I’m kind of tense about.  Everyone who knows me knows that magic systems are one of my “things,” along with “world building” and “shaving.”

Hope to see you there!

If I don’t, I’m-a cut you.

Phoenix Comicon Schedule Read More »

Sad Sacks of Fears

There’s probably a lot we should catch up on.

Comicon is a good one, coming up next weekend and going on for four freaking days.  I should remind you to come see me at that one, certainly.

I should also tell you about my event, May 28th, at The Poisoned Pen with my very talented friend, John Scalzi, which you should also come to, definitely.

I could tell you about Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides and how it was so awful that I’m almost certain it was the event that was supposed to kick off the Rapture that failed to come about today (and as we all know, said Rapture was only delayed by the noble sacrifice of Randy ‘Macho Man’ Savage, may he rest in peace).  But Adam Roberts already did that.

Perhaps it’s just a suggestion of my own professionalism that I won’t be talking about those, but rather something else.

I’ve been published for about a year and a half now and they’ve not all been happy moments.  There have been times when I didn’t get the success I wanted exactly when I wanted, times when I’ve gotten reviews that hurt, times that I’ve gotten reviews that hurt from people who I really wanted to like the book and times that have made me just stop and stare and think it was a pretty rotten day to be Sam Sykes.

As Brent Weeks once pointed out to me, though, there’s not a lot of fishing for sympathy for these kinds of problems.  After all, I’m published.  I’m writing.  I’m doing what I love and I’m getting paid to do it in enough increments that I can live comfortably.  In summation, most of my problems are pretty trifling when I’m faced with one of the bigger issues that comes from this job.

Or, more specifically, people trying to get into this job.

It was when I was talking with a writer’s group on twitter that the mention was made of crushing their dreams and selling their souls to get published.  I was a little taken aback by this, despite the fact that it was obviously a joke.  Possibly because it was never that hard for me to get published (don’t hit me.  DON’T HIT ME).  But I think it’s more that I have a hard time grasping the cynicism that comes through this sort of idea that getting published is some malefic black art that can’t be performed without condensed powder of human suffering mixed with the tears of a bride whose husband drops dead on the aisle offered at the Altar of Seventy-Seven Sins and Sons to the Foul Gods of Editing (my editor, Simon Spanton, prefers that I just ship him suffering directly and cut out the middleman, while Lou Anders has pretty much said he’d be fine with a chicken sandwich).

The cynicism that comes with trying, and struggling, to get published, I think, is what defeats more writers than anything else.  Writing takes talent, time, persistence, work, luck and a bunch of other stuff that I can’t name right now and I think when cynicism replaces one of those things, it quickly devours the rest and leaves the aspiring authors feeling frustrated, irritated and discouraged.  I can totally see why that happens, but I’m here to tell you that it doesn’t really have to be that way.

I’m not saying blind optimism is the route to take, naturally assuming that you’re just so goddamned talented and Buddha loves you so damn much that you just have to get published eventually. But it’s not too far off.  See, writing, like anything, is something you get better at as you do it.  Keep at it and chances do favor your getting published.

But I think it’s a lot less dangerous to be optimistic than assuming you’re going to fail for not living up to something imaginary.  I’m not going to leave it at that, either.  So let’s discuss some of the big hurdles we erect for ourselves as writers and how to overcome them…or at least the five biggest ones.

5. “It’s impossible to get published without compromising the integrity of your work to appeal to the masses, so why bother?”

This one I’ll address first because it pretty much goes against the fundamental idea of publishing: people want to read stories.  It’s true that you can see a million vampire romance knock-off novels out there right now, just as it was true you could see a million boy wizard magic school novels a few years ago, and it will be true that you’ll see a million knock-offs of misanthropic adventurers meet evangelical underworld forces…cough, cough.  Sorry, had something in my throat.  It should be noted that a lot of these are the instances of authors wanting to hit it big and jumping on board a train that’s leaving the station, not the publishers issuing a worldwide decree that vampires, and only vampires, shall be published forthwith ’till the lamb lay with the hippo and the fourth moon doth fall from the sky.

It’s also true that a lot of publishers won’t reject the knock-offs that come through their desks, assuming the book is well-written.  Keep that in mind, because it’s important: publishers want well-written books.  Now, as publishing goes through some severe shake-ups, is a pretty excellent time to be new talent.  Publishers are hungry not for the same thing, but things that will endure and give them something to cling to when vampires aren’t popular.  This frequently means the unique, the unconventional, the stuff that isn’t obviously going to be a huge hit right off the bat.

Remember that point earlier, though: the book has to be well-written.  You can be as crazy as shit so long as you understand plot development, character, technique and grammar.  It’s unfair for you to say that the publishing world isn’t ready to handle you when your autobiography about the past lives you’ve led as a chambermaid to the Raptor Buddha are full of spelling errors and use the word “coitus” six times in a single sentence in the prologue.

4. “The publishing industry is incestuous, so new authors don’t have a chance to break in.”

Refer to above.  Publishers do want new talent.  Publishers also want to give and draw attention to their bestsellers and successful authors.  Possibly because it’s kind of insane for them to buy a new author and then neglect him, since that means they’re getting less money, as it is insane for them to push aside and neglect their older authors, since that also means there’s less money.

Believe me, I know how easy it is to see conspiracy where there isn’t any.  When things aren’t going your way, when you’ve gotten another rejection slip, when books aren’t moving as fast as you’d like, it’s incredibly cathartic to say “it’s all PATRICK ROTHFUSS’ fault.  That guy has a stranglehold on the market and his publishers won’t let anyone else play ball.”  That’s ridiculous, of course.  Patrick Rothfuss probably didn’t set out to make you fail.  I mean, it’s possible that he does have a diabolical lair beneath his humble Wisconsin home from which he directs his publishers to stymie and destroy people he doesn’t like while simultaneously stroking a cat that occasionally gets lost in the depths of his beard, but it’s not likely.

But the other answer is equally unsatisfying.  Sometimes, things just don’t work out as well as you’d like them to.  It sucks, believe me, but it’s not their fault.  It’s probably not even your fault.  It’s just…sucky.  But “sucky” is just a word (and not a grammatically proper word, either).

3. “The publishing industry is too greedy to let new authors in.”

Same deal as above.  You’re totally right in assuming that the publishing industry is slightly greedy.  I mean, it’s a business, motherfucker.  They want money.  You want money.  They get money when you get money.  They get money by introducing new talent, by helping that talent succeed, by increasing the diversity in the market.  The opposite of that is the same authors with the same stuff being read by the same people who will eventually get tired and move onto something else.  This is not good business.  It’s better business to have those authors for the times when the audience wants those authors and to have newer and different authors when the audience wants those authors.

There is no such thing as a reader that reads only one book.  There is no such thing as a publisher that believes otherwise.

2. “Breakout authors set the standard.  If I were going to be published, I’d be published now.”

It’s unreasonable to expect that your success will mime other authors’, because it’s unreasonable to expect that any author’s path to success is the same as anyone else’s.  Patrick Rothfuss is a big success, yes.  It took George R.R. Martin a lot longer to break onto the NYT bestseller list.  Some huge authors never do.  Some are loved by critics.  Some are not.  Some do it slowly, some do it awkwardly, some do it quickly and peter out and never come back.  Some don’t.

Publishing is not a competitive sport.  Trying to judge your own career based off of what other people are doing is not going to help you out a lot.  The temptation is there, I know, and it’s instinctual for us to try to figure out where we’re at by looking at the other guy.  But it doesn’t really work like that and you’ll only drive yourself crazier by thinking you’re doing terribly because someone else’s career is doing something that yours isn’t.

By the same token, it’s unreasonable to think of the publishers as enemies to be overcome.  That’s a pretty shitty way to potentially start a professional relationship with them.

Resist your urges.

1. “It’s hard.”

Fuck yeah, it’s hard!  It’s a job!  You don’t get to lounge around and wait for the Muse to descend from heaven and elegantly unbutton your pants for you.  You’ve gotta be out there. You’ve gotta write when you don’t feel like it, you’ve gotta keep smiling when you’re eating doo doo and you’ve gotta resist the urge to go on a shooting rampage.  There are reasons for doing that.  None of them should be over books that aren’t being burned in front of you.  If they are, you have my permission to open fire and my hope that the judge will accept that as a reasonable defense.

But I’ll tell you this: you better get over it.  I’m not saying that as a token to the hard-assed ways of my idol and personal savior, R. Lee Ermey, but rather as a plain truth.  The rejection doesn’t stop after you get published.  The despair doesn’t always get better.  Everything is not sunshine and farts.  You’re a writer.  You’re a creative person.  You will create new problems for yourself.  But there will be plenty of people who tell you you can’t do it.  Don’t do their work for them.

Shit happens.

Sometimes it’s your fault.

Sometimes it’s not.

Reflect.  Think.  Figure out what you can do beyond saying “it’s hopeless.”  Because it never is and if it truly was, no one would be published.

It’s not about faith or optimism.  It’s about logic.  If you keep moving, no matter how small the steps you take are, you will get there.

Easy to say.

Hard to do.

No shit.

Sad Sacks of Fears Read More »

The Haul

Do you ever read a book very slowly, or make your character walk instead of run through a video game, or quietly hope that there’s some kind of plot twist in a movie that would drag it out by another fifteen minutes because you don’t want it to end?  Do you ever do that and then realize you are a tremendously egotistical jerkwad who wants to draw things out for everyone else because you value your happiness over theirs?

Because that is exactly what birthdays are like.

It is a day on which the world revolves around you and only you.  And if you are not using that to your advantage by making extravagant and ridiculous demands of other people and thereby feeding off their suffering, then you are simply not doing it right. In many ways, this post exists as something educational, something to show you exactly how to work the vast and corrupt mechanics of the birthday system to your advantage.

It might also be me talking about what I got, thereby trying to cast a shadow upon your own lack of joy on May 11th and thusly expounding upon my own delight in your suffering.  But that’s pretty much what this post is all about, isn’t it?

Aside from some lovely-looking shirts, the only true present I got was this lovely piece of fan art from Michael Lee Lunsford depicting a sweaty, smelly Kataria.

Pretty intense, right?  I thought so.  I do love arts of the picture variety, mostly because I can’t do anything resembling it.  It’s why I enjoy hanging around webcomics peoples.

But you might be noticing that this is but one present.  It’s true that my greed and lust could not be satiated with one piece of art, however awesome.  But it is also true that a man of my dignity and poise can no longer be satiated with mere material greed.  A man of my peculiar depravities and exuberant disrespects can only be glutted on making obscene demands of people and forcing them to comply.

I sent out many such demands.  Let us gather to celebrate those who supported me in this.

First, sent to my good friend, Leanna Renee Hieber...

Dear Leanna,

As you undoubtedly know, May 11th is my birthday.  I hope you have been thinking very hard and ferociously about what to get me, as I have frequently done with your birthday.  Much to my lament, you never told me what your birthday is on, so I basically decided to make it up and now celebrate it in a solemn, candlelit vigil on the blackest day of December.  I then sacrifice a cow.

But this is besides the point.

For my birthday, I would like you to openly and wistfully say on your blog: “If only there were more men like Sam Sykes.”  What words come before and after it are up to you.

Verdict?

SUCCESS.

Next, from my friend, Mark C. Newton…

Dearest Mark,

Did you know May 11th is my birthday?  Good.  Good.  I knew you would.  I hope you haven’t gotten me a present yet, because what I think I would really like is, when you are on a panel attended by more than 10 people, if you would say my name and then pause, staring dreamily out into the distance and sigh wistfully.

It will be amazingly awkward and you will feel terrible for doing it.  I will appreciate the gesture.

Verdict?

Pending.  Those of you who attend Mr. Newton’s panels, see his public appearances, keep a close eye upon him.  This is not something I will let go so easily.

And from Ms. N.K. Jemisin?

Dearest Nora,

As you well know, May 11th is my birthday.  I trust you have been wracking your brains, trying to figure out what to get me, in a search that has taken you through many J. Crew and Sky Mall catalogues.  As I am as proud to be helpful as I am to be your friend, I have come to you with a simple suggestion.  For my birthday, I would like for you to take on the nickname of Horace Cameo for a period of one year.  Only I will be able to call you this.  Anyone else, you can rightly beat up, because it is a silly name.

Do this and I will give you great power.

Verdict?

Hi Sam,

Alas, I must reject your nickname in favor of a better one, which I gave myself a few years ago, but which I cannot tell anyone else or I’ll have to beat *myself* up.

Happy birthday, tho’!

Unfortunately, she is far too clever for my unique blend of masculine charms, devilish phraseology and pleasant bumbling oafishness.  And yet, I cannot help but admire such gaming of the system.  You win this round, Jemisin.

Next, the bloggers, that routinely disappointing subset of humanity.  I posed to my favorite bloggers one request and one request alone…

Make this face:

Verdict?

Two?!  AND ONLY TWO?!

The sure-footed stalwartness of Floor to Ceiling Books and Neth Space in doing this cannot be overstated.  But as for other people?  The feckless Book Smugglers, the irreverent Pat’s Fantasy Hotlist and even my own beloved Crooked Carla looked me in the eye and spat upon my wishes.

For your treasonous ways, you shall make atonement.  You shall review Black Halo and, in doing so, use the phrase “Courage Wolf” in a ubiquitous and unassuming manner.  Do this or I shall strike you down and become more powerful than you can imagine because winners don’t do drugs.

Despite the treasonous blasphemies of those stated above, it cannot be said I did not have a good birthday.  Good art (with the promise of more to come, you smelly artists), lovely cakes and succor from my friends is all well and good.  But the crowning jewel?  The utmost end of my desires?  The following, from a very special friend of mine…

Me to him…

Say aloud in a public venue: “Sam Sykes inspires me.”

Him to me…

Oh, I’ve already done that many times.

Take that, Abercrombie.  Take that.  Put it over your hearth and hang it as your head hangs.

When your daughters come of age and sit upon your knee before the family, I want them to look at that, hanging there like a shroud above your life.  I want them to look at that and ask you: “Daddy, why did you say that?”

And then I want you to weep.

Happy birthday.

The Haul Read More »

The Worst Month in the World

That’s actually a lie.  May is possibly the best month in the world, for several reasons.  Three of which I will list below…

1. I Was Born in May!

Yes!  I was born on May 11th!  That’s tomorrow!  How in the hell!

What’s that?  You want to get me a present?  Oh, you’re too kind.  Surrender your wife to me.  No?  Well, if you’re going to be all stingy like that.

Really, though, if you’re reading this blog, you’ve probably read my books and (presumably) enjoyed them.  Thus, you have already done me a pretty big kindness.  A few neat readers offered fan art, which was very cool since I do like me some fan art, and Blake Charlton offered to consider the Blood Debt I incurred when he rescued my daughter from the maw of the Eelhund fulfilled, so that’s pretty good.

If you really want to give me a present, though, and you live in Arizona, you could always come see me at…

2. Phoenix Comicon!

…which is also in May!

I had an awesome time at the last Comicon, in which I sat on several panels and in which the famous Head of Scalzi was created.  I hear tell that Mr. Scalzi might be there again this year and it is rumored he seeks to exact revenge for not portraying his floating, laser-beam-shooting head in a more flattering light.  Or maybe he was just in the neighborhood?  Who knows!

Also, some chump named Cherie Priest is going to be there.  She wrote some book that people said was p. cool I don’t know and I guess it won some awards or something and was sort of declared to be a papery messiah delivering us all from a stagnant fiction hell maybe you like that sort of thing.

And, most importantly…

3. May is a Month for Scalzis!

It is true that I say many things about John Scalzi, to the point that one diligent reader actually made a note of it.  It is also true that this blog post, and indeed this month, is doing absolutely nothing to dispel that particular notion.  Because John Scalzi and I will be doing an event at The Poisoned Pen Bookstore in Scottsdale on May 28th!

I know.  Awesome, right?  We’re probably going to rock one of several casbahs.  I hope you can join us for it.

Mention this blog post and get punched in the gut!

See you there!

I know this blog post is short!

Shut up!

The Worst Month in the World Read More »

The Ghost of Charles Xavier

We go through life thinking that things are a way they are for a reason.  There is safety in predetermination, comfort in destiny, the knowledge that we don’t have to try if we’re not the chosen one, that we don’t have to worry if we are.  We search for order in the universe that we may know some semblance of piece amidst a giant rock that is spinning further out of control every year, withering us to dust as it does and robbing lives that had no meaning to begin with.  Most of the time, we are content with this.

And then sometimes, something happens that ruins everything.

Ladies…gentlemen…friends, all…

Thor is apparently good.

I was not prepared to hear this.  I was ready to write off Thor as a piece of shit the moment I saw the trailer.  And who could blame me?  Logic was on my side.  The rule of three was on my side.

The rule of three is something I deduced after being an ardent fan of the Spider-Man and X-Men movies and it states simply that superhero movies move in a pattern: the first is good, the second is awesome, the third is horrifying.  The above franchises should provide adequate proof on that point, yes?  Hell, even the Hulk movies have followed this formula, if only because the first one was bad and the second one was okay.

It is why I fear for the third Batman movie, why I fear for the third Iron Man movie (though I hear tell that there’s a sizable faction that disagrees with my position that it was better than the first, these people being clearly heathens).  And, elevating that theory higher, it was why I had low hopes for Thor. If we follow the logic that every third movie is awful, then it stands to reason that there is at least one in three Marvel franchises that will be awful too: the Hulk, Daredevil.  Between the impending X-Men: First Class (which I gather is a reboot) and Captain America movies, Thor seemed like a prime target.

Apparently, I was wrong.

Two of my favorite bloggers have said it was good.  I’m inclined to trust them on this and see for myself, but the fact that the movie has been accepted as “good” by the majority of the populace seems to suggest that, whatever franchise fails, it won’t be Thor.

…so, who will it be?

Fortunately, for you, I’ve set up a fun way to talk about it with…

The Superhero Movie Betting Pool!

Here’s what we are going to do: name the impending superhero movies (of which I am aware of at least four) and decide which ones are going to succeed and fail and why.  Why would you do this?  This is a fantasy writer’s blog.  If you’re reading this, you’ve probably been dying for a reason to say this stuff.

Green Lantern: I predict moderate success.  The lack of an un-cliched personal conflict and the vast scope of it will send it reeling into everything we expect from a superhero movie: a reluctant hero, a sudden power, a standard discovery of powers in which the character flies around going “woooooohooooo.”  It will be a solid debut, paving the way for future movies, but its adherence will limit its impact.

X-Men: First Class: Less than successful.  Much in the same way X-Men Origins: Wolverine was an attempt to crawl back out of the hole the movies had fallen in, this new movie will be one more lost footing and send them sliding closer back.  It won’t be bad, as we know it, but it will be underwhelming and leave no particularly intense impressions as they try to establish the origins of a film series that’s already (technically) had an origins story.

Captain America: Bad.  Take no prisoners bad.  With a plot that lends itself to slightly less impressive effects, a lot of this will fall on the male lead (which has traditionally never been a strong suit of a lot of Marvel movies).  It will be a pretty unremarkable mess that is made worse by the fact that it wants to be taken seriously.

The Dark Knight Rises: I’m clinging too much to tradition here, but I’m pessimistic.  It won’t fit the conventional definition of bad, but it doesn’t have to to fail.  It just has to fail to meet The Dark Knight. A pretty intense task, even without the fact that the addition of Catwoman rings a little too close to another out-of-place fan favorite that ruined a franchise.  It’ll be a solid movie, damned by its predecessor.

I don’t always nerd out.

But when I do, I prefer to do it over comic books.

The Ghost of Charles Xavier Read More »

Holy Shit, I’m at LepreCon

There are times I wonder how invested I am in my own professional well-being when I forget these things, but yeah, I’m at LepreCon this impending weekend.  It’s a fairly tight-knit, exciting affair that I attended last year and had a great time with.  It’s small enough that interacting with various people is pretty easy and, in fact, almost impossible.  Given that talking to people is one of my favorite parts of any con, I’m quite partial to this one.

Please have a perusal of the Peruvian persuasion at my schedule hither:

LIT – STORY WRITING FOR BEGINNERS or “Quick and Dirty Story Creation”.  Have you always wanted to write a story?  Has the process of writing been difficult, too time consuming or intimidating?  Do you wonder how successful writers do it?  Using easy, proven techniques that the pros use, you can start writing that story you always wanted to write–NOW!  Tabitha Bradley will show you some easy shortcuts and tips that will get you right to what you really want to do: writing.  Bring some paper, netbook or something to take notes on and get ready to learn how the Pros do it!
Fri 1p-2p, Palm E. Tabitha Bradley, Sam Sykes

LIT – DIY SOCIAL MEDIA promotion for authors.  Ways that aspiring authors can use current internet social media tools – Twitter, podcasting, blogging, Facebook, Myspace, etc. – to draw attention and build fan communities around themselves and their works.

Sat noon-1p, Xavier. Jack Mangan (Moderator), Diana Gabaldon , Patti Hultstrand, Sam Sykes

LIT – WORKING CLASS HEROES?  H.G. Wells wrote one of the great class warfare stories (The Time Machine), but a lot of fantasy and science fiction ignores the working class. How many working class heroes are there? Are they under-represented today?

Sat 2p-3p, Xavier. Will Shetterly (Moderator), Rick Novy, Sam Sykes

LIT – EDITING YOUR WORK.  Editing is a necessary part of the writing process. For some it’s harder than others, but we all have to do it. Learn simple techniques to make this process easier and more enjoyable.

Sat 3p-4p, Xavier. Gini Koch, Beth Mecham, Sam Sykes

Holy shit.

That Sam Sykes, always helpin’ people out!

I’m sure there’s some kind of reading session/autograph session/fistfight in there somewhere, too.  So, if you stop by, please do check in with me.

Or I will punch you right in the gonads.

Holy Shit, I’m at LepreCon Read More »

Shizzle Your Brains Out

So, we’re friends, right?

We can talk about anything?  No judgments?  You won’t store what I tell you to use for later during an entertainment-starved winter, not unlike a gossip-hungry hamster, greedily stuffing his fat, fluffy face with all manner of horrible secrets to use in his deadly hamster politics?  No?  Good.

I’ve heard tell that some people use blogs to talk about stuff that doesn’t pertain to writing, work or books.  This struck me as absolutely insane, at first, since I always feel vaguely guilty about wasting peoples’ time with my blog.  It’s like, if I want to say something, I have this intense urge to make it somewhat relevant to what’s going on in peoples’ lives so they don’t read this blog and go “what’s this nonsense?  He has a personal life?  I came here to learn.

All the same, people have used their blogs to tell stories and I haven’t posted anything in awhile.  Part of this is due to the fact that I am basically a busy beaver, busily penning The Skybound Sea and hoping it all turns out okay.  Another part of this is because I have been in Portland, Oregon for the past week, gleefully enjoying its sights.  And in fact, these two are related.

I quite like Portland.  In fact, I like anywhere that rains because I tend to feel better about things when other people are miserable in some way, shape or form, which is why I occasionally send anonymous hate mail under the guise of one Jethro Rumpette, French migrant and luddite, to various authors.  But there are many reasons to like Portland.  Chief of which is that I got to meet Brent Weeks while I was over there.

With the exception of that one time I urinated on Joe Abercrombie’s foot, it was possibly the best encounter I have ever had with another author and, in fact, Brent remains the sole person in history to ever render me speechless.  Not by wit, mind you.  Nor by awe.  Simply because Brent, while only slightly intoxicated, managed to string together a sentence so insane that there was absolutely no way I could have said anything that could have possibly matched it without going into realms of forbidden expressions.  Unwilling to commit myself to these darker conversational arts, I yielded and, for my failure, Brent now accepts this as blessing and curse.

Suffice to say: anyone hoping that Brent Weeks’ personality does not match his writing will be sorely disappointed.

It’s hard to beat that for sheer awesomeness in a trip, I admit.  In fact, not even the self-fellating sea otter we encountered at the Oregon Zoo could top it (and fuck if that otter wasn’t trying his damnedest to earn that honor).  There was, however, one activity that did eventually trump it for sheer command of attention.  Not in terms of positivity or negativity, but simply in terms of being.  This event was so eventful that it demands, and receives, the top spot for this trip.

It’s worth mentioning that my cousin was on this trip with me, visiting from Virginia.  My cousin is seventeen and I am an immature man-child, so we spent a lot of time playing “Would You Rather.”  This is not a fun game.  This is not a good game.  This is a horrible game in which you offer a man two terrible choices and ask him which he would rather do.  Usually, these involve concepts like having to choose between receiving gratification from an orangutan and placing your face in a pile of manure or something similar.  But it was a vacation, so things got spirited and we came up with the following question:

Would you rather never have the ability to fly or have the ability to fly via propulsion from a corkscrewing stream of watery waste expelled from your rear end?

This eventually weighed heavily on our minds.  On the one hand, it’s flight.  However, all the things one hopes to do via flying (such as saving people from burning buildings) goes out the window when it’s a rocket of diarrhea that does the work.  I mean, no one’s going to climb on your back and let you poop them out of a house, right?  Right.

But what if it wasn’t a choice?  What if Uncle Ben was right and power, no matter what it is, must be used wisely?  What must you do?

This became more apparent when my sister, whom we were visiting, introduced us to a little restaurant called Salvador Molly’s.  I’m not going to link it.  Because it’s awful.  If you were to choose five decrepit representatives of the countries in the UN, at random, and put them in a kitchen and tell them to best express their culture through food to hipsters, you would have Salvador Molly’s.  You would also have severe diarrhea, as my cousin had.

Some people tell vacation stories as they relate to locales.  Some people tell stories through the food they ate.  I tell stories based on bathroom experiences.  And this one was pretty horrifying.  This is not an exaggeration.  It was horror.  It was Lovecraftian.  My cousin would go to the toilet in the middle of the night and emerge whispering strange things in strange languages, like a man who had seen the absolute nadir of decadence wrought by that which nature could not destroy and rejected society–nay, reality–outright.  The bathroom was a gateway to a world beyond our own, existing parallel to ours and yet coming frightfully close, as though it were the grill of a semi truck we could see in the rear view mirror of our tiny mini cooper.  Except with poop.

It ended, as so many things do, without climax.  No songs from heaven, no odes composed, for poetry is a joyous thing and who could find joy in the tragedy that we bore witness to that day?  Upon the third day, my cousin emerged from the toilet.  He looked at me, sadly, as though he had learned some great truth and it burdened him to know it.  And he said, quite softly.

“And now I know what prison feels like.”

Gentlemen.

I have just written over one thousand words on this subject.

You have read it.

If you are feeling even a little worse for having done so, I feel better for it.

Good day.

Shizzle Your Brains Out Read More »

The Wrong Trousers

What you will find in this link here is, overall, a good thing.  I don’t like that fantasy isn’t taken very seriously.  I don’t find a lot of peoples’ reasons for not taking it seriously to be all that solid.  I think it’s good to call out behavior that appears vaguely douchebaggish…douchey?  Douchesque?

You’ll note I haven’t signed said petition yet.  This is, of course, partially due to the fact that the last petition I signed ended with me absently joining a cause called Marvin’s Law, which suggested that those who disagreed with the obscure political opinions of the late Marvin Gaye should be made into eunuchs.  But there are other reasons.

For one, it’s never occurred to me to get upset at the BBC and those who don’t take fantasy seriously for the same reason it’s never occurred to me to take it seriously when narwhal biologists write to me and say: “You know, there’s just not enough narwhals in this book.”  I’m not talking to narwhal biologists and the needs of narwhal biologists don’t really factor into what I do.  This is, of course, hyperbole, since the people behind mainstream literature recognition and I presumably share similar interests, but when our agendas are set differently, I don’t really mind that they don’t match up.

But beyond that, I don’t know that the idea sits that well with me.  Today, while browsing twitter, I found this quote in Adam Whitehead’s feed from this link here:

‘It’s almost like they’ve given us older writers licence to use it. Before, it was ghettoised and stigmatised. For years there has been a prejudice towards sci-fi writing, which I think has been to the loss of the literary world, and not vice versa. But with things like graphic novels now, people are taking it seriously.’ Still, he has misgivings: ‘In truth, the sci-fi label is misleading. I’m just wary like everybody else that it’ll bring in the wrong audience with the wrong expectations.’

This was from Kazuo Ishiguro on science fiction acceptance into mainstream.

And it’s those last few words that make me hesitate before fully committing myself to the cause of the anti-BBC sentiment.

“The wrong audience.”

In the context, it’s clear that Mr. Ishiguro is suggesting that people looking for narwhals won’t find them in science fiction, so to speak, which is a point worth noting in itself.  But more than that, there are implications regarding the phrase “the wrong audience” that sort of haunt me.

It’s only been fairly recently that “nerd” has stopped being a dirty word.  Nerds are not overweight and smelly people with thick, horn-rimmed glasses squatting in basements.  D&D is something you play, not a lifestyle you live.  Liking fantasy means you like fantasy, not that you live in perpetual denial of the world around you.

It wasn’t always this way.  Nerds used to be the kind of people that dwelled in clandestine organizations.  If you were a nerd, your interests were restricted mostly to imaginary people and paper.  It was an unfair stereotype then and it’s unfair now, and a lot of people in mainstream literature still cling to it.  Sadly, in some instances, so do we.

I’m going to preface what I say next with a few things:

-I can’t really cite specific sources

-It might come off as a bit whiny and self-indulgent (it’s not intended to, though)

-I don’t blame you at all if you decide to stop reading because of these

But we, as genre writers and readers, are not innocent.

R.A. Salvatore.  China Mieville.  One sells a ton, another wins awards.  Fight scenes, weird races.  Sells-a-lot, genius.  Not-touched-by-Locus, critically-acclaimed-everywhere.  We seem pretty content to let this lie and safely file the two authors away under their own little labels, but we’re not happy when fantasy, as a whole, is filed away under “drek.”  We draw hard lines between hard sci-fi and soft sci-fi, epic fantasy and heroic fantasy, us and them.  If you’re on one side, you’re not on the other and you don’t get to be in that camp.

Now, this is not at all to suggest that Salvatore is the same as Mieville, even by a little.  Mieville earns his awards.  Salvatore earns his paychecks.

But they aren’t really judged in the same way, are they?  I’m not you, so I can’t say what you thought when you heard Salvatore’s name, but I imagine “not real fantasy” in one way or another, be it those actual words or just a brief, fleeting pang of resentful nostalgia like you feel for when you think of when you used to think Pogs were cool, cropped up.  Either way, you wouldn’t think to judge them the same way.

But should they even be?

We can argue that they write different things, different styles, different content entirely and that it’s impossible to judge them by the same standard.  If we do judge them the same, we live with the suggestion that we’re wrong to look at Salvatore book and sneer.  If we don’t judge them the same, we send the message that it’s fine for us to judge people differently, but not for you, mainstream literature.

We might say that the issue is that Mieville deserves to win a mainstream prize because his work is just that good.  But in that case, are we acknowledging that the awards he gets are not good enough for him?

Of course, it’s also perfectly fine to say that Salvatore/Mieville just doesn’t do it for us and we prefer Mieville/Salvatore.  Nothing wrong with preference, in the slightest.  What Mieville’s saying doesn’t really interest us, what Salvatore’s doing doesn’t really jive with us, what we’re really interested in is Sam motherfucking Sykes, right?

But then, if it’s all about preference, why does the acceptance of someone who doesn’t share our preference matter?

So, I guess that’s why I haven’t committed to anything yet.  It seems we lack a pretty solid stand.  Are we different or are we the same?  Do we need to be recognized for what we’ve done for narwhal biology or is it okay that they don’t like us?

But maybe I’m missing something important.  I’m not claiming to be making any sweeping declarations of what is and what is not here.  There could be another issue that I’ve totally missed and there’s no reason for this post to exist.

If there is, though, I’d love it if you’d tell me.

The Wrong Trousers Read More »

The Eff Wyrd

It’s been a good couple of days for me, lately.

Just yesterday, I had a chat with my agent, Danny Baror, who said he had been talking with a Serbian book publisher who has apparently been tweeting with me.  “He says you are very funny,” said Danny, “very impressed by how many times you can use the f word in a single sentence.”

This is how authors roll, my friends.

You might want to read this here very excellent, very awesome review of Black Halo by Robert Berg.  Rob has been one of my favorite reviewers for awhile, and still would be even if The Aeons’ Gate books didn’t work for him.  He’s honest and thoughtful and has absolutely no problem admitting he straight-up likes something, which I note seems to be an issue for a lot of reviewers.  Of course, since he does like The Aeons’ Gate books, he’s even better.

That was just the start of exciting things, really.  Black Halo continues to be enjoyed by many.  I just found out that Jean-Sebastian Rossbach is doing the cover art for the French edition of Tome of the Undergates (which, according to my buddy/translator, Emmanuel Chastelliere, will involve Kataria and “some awful frogmen”).  I’m doing an event at the Poisoned Pen with John Scalzi on May 28th.  And, as a lovely little cherry on a sundae of sunshine served in a bowl marked ‘good times,’ I’ve been invited to be a guest at the 2012 Tucson Festival of Books!

As of right now?  I’m in Portland, Oregon, visiting my sister.  I just had dinner with the phenomenal Brent Weeks, who is both humble and affable and non-judgmental (I can’t stress this enough).

But, as of Wednesday, I will be in Seattle for Norwescon. I highly suggest you stop by and see me there if you’re thinking of coming.  I’ll be doing some panels on themes, worldbuilding and other fine things that people in fantasy talk about, as well as helping out with a presentation on Pyr Books.

So, yes.  It has been a good couple of days for me.  You may feel happy for me.

I don’t often share good news on the blog, of course.  I’m not sure why, but I tend to forget the occurrence of good news in a matter of days while bad news tends to linger over me like a cloud for a long-ass time.  Beyond that, though, I’m convinced that, in keeping with the idea that the divine has a cruel sense of humor, whenever I have good news, it means bad news for someone else.

And, as if to prove me right, this has been a pretty good week for internet trainwrecks.

Publisher’s Weekly runs a column addressing the Jessica Verday deal that we actually discussed awhile back and, upon hearing dissenting opinions to an article proclaiming an abhorrence to censorship, decided to delete a bunch of comments that suggested Run Press might not be authentic.  Is it just me, or is the phrase “in this age of the internet” basically code for “I said something stupid and now everyone knows about it?”

The New York Times successfully alienated women and fantasy fans in their review of the HBO adaptation of A Game of Thrones.

And, probably most embarrassingly, noted cartoonist/misogynist Scott Adams has been caught sockpuppeting his own internet defense.

I’m beginning to wonder if, like Forgotten Realms and Thundercats, watching people meltdown or screw up on the internet is something you can only enjoy for a certain number of years.  Ordinarily, I would be giggling like a madman at these particularly exciting disasters (particularly at Scott Adams, whom I’ve become somewhat less enchanted with since, you know, the horrifying anti-woman sentiment he’s become famous for spewing), but really, I find myself wondering how it came to this.

I’m fairly sure I’ve suggested before that the word “fuck” is the most important word in the English language today.  If I haven’t, then I am now, and I feel I’m pretty well-justified.  It’s a word of passion, a word of anger, a word of excitement, a word of humor and, as we’re going to discuss, a word of humility.

As in “I fucked up.  Sorry.”

My dad taught me a number of things before I moved out of his house, many of them revolving around reasons about why I should move out of his house, but one of the most important things I’ve ever learned from him is the concept that there is no shame in owning up to a fuck up and apologizing.  It’s tough as shit, I know, and more than a little awkward, but what’s the alternative?  Creating a dummy account to praise your own genius?

I guess there’s the concept of pride getting in the way, of course: admitting your wrong means admitting you’re wrong, after all, and people may call that into question when you ever argue anything again.  And if you actually do happen to believe that people shouldn’t be arguing with you over disputed facts about homosexual relations in anthologies, or that fantasy readers are nerds that need to grow up, or that women are screaming children and equal pay and dignity is the candy they wail over, you probably shouldn’t be apologizing for a fuck up, because at that point, the fuck up is no longer an incident and you are the fuck up and there’s not a tremendous amount to discuss nor a particularly great reason to pay attention to you.

But, for most of us, we don’t believe those things.  For most of us, though, there will be moments when we do fuck up.  Especially if you’re hoping to be a writer in the public eye.  You will almost definitely fuck up at some point.  And you will have that opportunity, fleeting as it may be, to cop to it.

Just remember that there’s no shame in doing so.

This all goes out the window, of course, if you’re me.

I’m basically perfect.

If you ever disagree with me, it’s you that has the problem.

OKAY, BUDDY?

Love,

Sam

The Eff Wyrd Read More »

Where Have All the Cow-Men Gone

From a long bout of abstinence from fantasy novels, I have returned.  Today, I am reading The Dragon’s Path by Daniel Abraham.  His other series, The Long Price Quartet, didn’t really work with me, since me am dumb fantasy reader.

It’s quite good.  His sense of focus doesn’t really jive with mine (which is something I’ll talk about later), but there’s a lot to praise here.  I haven’t seen quite as much as I’d like to for purposes of making a solid judgment, but there is one thing I’d like to talk about while it’s still fresh in my mind.

The Dragon’s Path takes place in a world of war and political intrigue, of fighting and carnage and, what I really liked, a world full of all kinds of different races living together.  Not always in harmony, mind, but they’re there and they’re raw.  It was about the time I saw the first unusual race that it struck me as to just how unusual this was.  Races other than human, defined by more than culture.  Honest to God alien, weird, scaly, furry, angry, jeweled weirdos walking alongside humanity.

It was then that another question struck me: exactly why did we give up unusual races in fantasy?  I guess there’s a few reasons, really.

Some authors are sparse with magic and with creatures in an effort to make them more impactful when they finally do show up.  If you think back to the old Conan stories, most of the wizards and sorcerers didn’t do a tremendous lot beyond making people poop themselves or lifting heavy objects as frail old men.  And yet, it was pretty intense when that happened, because no one else could do it and no one was really sure what it could do.  And, likewise, a hulking lizardman is a lot more scary if there’s only one of him, because you have no idea what he is, exactly, if he doesn’t have a tribe or culture.

But there’s a bigger reason.

The people who accuse fantasy of not being realistic are not exactly wrong and not exactly for the reasons you’re thinking of.  “Escapism,” as the word is so often used, usually carries with it the connotation of disingenuousness.  It’s not realistic, it’s not accurate and it’s not human.  Perhaps in an effort to shed that stereotype, we also shed the magic, the monsters and the races in favor of politics, intrigue and more things that all of us can relate to…like being thrown out a window for discovering a royal incestuous coup.

Who hasn’t that happened to?

I kid, of course.

These practices have worked well for the authors that use them, but I think we might have lost something in our abandonment of fantastic races.

As I said, the people who throw around escapism as equating to disingenuousness are not exactly wrong, but they’re not exactly right, either.  When you use fantasy races as cut-and-paste bad guys or nondescript ethereal beings of great wisdom, then yeah, you’re not really creating much beyond cannon fodder and/or plot devices.  But when you make a race more than just a name and a war cry, when you apply a culture, an attitude, a struggle and a history, you’re making a commentary on humanity, whether you intended to or not.

I’m not saying that anyone who writes a story in which orcs aren’t all that bad is qualified to give a seminar on race relations, but that story has put an idea out there.  It’s made a point that we can accept, refute or apply to our own lives.  And when that point is made, when it clicks for the reader, then the conflict from which that point came from is more easy to invest into, making a stronger story.

A strong culture behind an alien race = stronger identity = stronger point = deeper conflict = deeper reader involvement = stronger story.

If you do it right.

And while I make it pretty well known that I don’t really care about worldbuilding, I make an exception when it comes to alien races.  The reason being that I loathe when worldbuilding stands segregate from character development.  Creating the race and the culture integrates the two.  We are closer to the world because we are closer to the race because we are closer to the character of that race.  It’s an excellent way of investing the reader in the world without beating him over the head with an epic poem.

And finally…

You remember Star Wars, don’t you?  Remember the Tattooine Cantina?  Remember seeing all these weird, alien creatures hanging out together?  Remember what that felt like?

Wonder.

Awe.

“What the–”

That’s what fantasy is all about.

To me, anyway.  It might be something different to you.  But then, what do you think?  Do you prefer your books bundled with lizardmen or do you prefer a straight-up, no-nonsense human-filled romp?

Tell me.

Tell me everything.

Go read The Dragon’s Path.

Peace.

Where Have All the Cow-Men Gone Read More »

Scroll to Top